Adam Koncz: First of all, etiquette: Argue with me all you want, but don’t tell me what my boobs are. If you want to assert that boobs in general are sexual, great, but don’t use personal pronouns to indicate a reference to MY boobs and then make a judgment about them. This is my body and no one gets to define my breasts.

Secondly, sorry, they are NOT “completely” sexual organs. They are still used to feed babies, and unless you want to go down arguing that breastfeeding is sexual activity, you’re gonna lose this fight.

Thirdly, I never said breasts weren’t sexual. I said they are not sexual objects, not pornographic, not obscene, not indecent. We find breasts sexually arousing, yes. Just like we find men’s naked chests to be sexually arousing. The difference is, we don’t DEFINE a man’s chest as a sexual object and therefore he can do what he wants with it — wear it out in public, put it on Instagram, etc. What I said was that we HYPER-sexualize a woman’s chest and then use that as an excuse to create more rules and boundaries about how she should display her body, which is sexist and wrong.

Lastly, thank you for supporting the dismantling of this ridiculous censorship and I agree with you: the internet is stupid.